84 schools have NO white British pupils at all... double the number of five years ago

Erm no I'm not. Im saying how utterly retarded the idea is that if you're "anti racist" you are immediately "anti white" If that argument is true, then so is the reverse ie "White people are racist" Both of these comments are not true

Tell me, what is a white sport?

Given that migrants have to cover the cost of their relocation - which is generally more expensive tha relocation paid by an indigenous person, why do you think they are necessarily going to work for 'lower pay'?

I literally said that you were correct in drawing the conclusion that "white people are racist" in the opinion of the anti-whites. In pointing this out i am trying to highlight the hypocrisy.

They have no problem with people holding whites responsible for all the world's ills, but balk immediately if a white objects to a person of any other race for any reason. This includes not wanting to hand over your country in some stupid pretense that you are enlightened.

Odd thing is that society preaches that this is a good thing since those schools are 100% diverse.

Because they don't know their rights and will work for lower pay and under unfair conditions.

That is not what I said at all. I said that you're comments are pretty retarded ie: IF Anti racism means to be anti white, then it also means that pro white means pro racism. Considering that you are (Im guessing) pro white, does that make you pro racism?

They're not necessarily going to work for lower pay. And the poster was asking how newly-arrived underqualified immigrants who are unable to speak English are able to get jobs where Brits cannot. I don't think we're talking about the same populations here.

However, a job is still a job. It still pays and some of the money will actually go towards the state as tax.

would you happen to be using events of the past to justify a discriminatory policy agenda against the interests of white british people? you sir are a hypocrite

apparently

although we all know that really, tibet is the most racist country on earth. how they can object to the "diversity" program conducted by the chinese i'll never know.

apparently

although we all know that really, tibet is the most racist country on earth. how they can object to the "diversity" program conducted by the chinese i'll never know.

Alot of people who make these comments make assumptions. Many genuinely believe that many immigrants are 'underqualified' but do not have much proof for this. In many cases migrant men are equally if not more qualified than the indigenous people. Furthermore, in many cases they are multilingual rather than monolingual - which is evidently useful when the customer base is international.

For example, if I went into rural England probably many older people may think I am a goat-herder just through appearance.

Tibet is quite obviously different to the UK. There are some countries where the local population are the minority. Are they racist? Are they committing genocide of their people?

Tell me, are you pro white?

How can I belittle the working class when my whole family earns way below the national average?

As it is, integration has always been a big part of what makes the UK what it is anyway.

If you consider yourself working class then sorry, my mistake. In that case you're evidently just a racist.

In that case I see what you mean. As I think I made clear in the post just before this, I am at any rate somewhat skeptical about this idea that loads of immigrants are managing to get jobs in this climate while 'indigenous' Brits are not.

are the local population allowed to voice objections to their minority status without being called racist?

are the local population allowed to voice objections to their minority status without being called racist?