The Student Room Group

UKIP don't want benefit claimants driving.

Scroll to see replies

Original post by SophieSmall
Anyone arguing for it is fighting a losing battle, they either clearly haven't thought about the consequences of such a policy, the difficulties of implementing it and the complete ridiculousness of it....Or they're one of those high horse bastards who just want people on benefits to miserable and punish them for being poor.


I also don't get why some right wingers are supporting it. It is unnecessary intrusion into the lives of citizens which would be very complicated and costly to enforce, not something you'd expect right wingers to be in favour of - they're normally against regulations they consider "unnecessary".
Original post by RFowler
I also don't get why some right wingers are supporting it. It is unnecessary intrusion into the lives of citizens which would be very complicated and costly to enforce, not something you'd expect right wingers to be in favour of - they're normally against regulations they consider "unnecessary".



Hardly surprising in this climate, everyone hates everyone right now. Even the poor hate the poor right now, no one is looking out for each other. Just look at the media they can't even decide who they hate more.
Why are people complaining about this when we already have numerous stupid laws barriers restricting private transport. For example the new motorcycle licence laws are one.
Original post by SophieSmall
What of those who live in areas with little/no public transport? Not to mention many jobs ask for the applicant to have their own form of transport, so they could be missing out on jobs.


Cant give you the thumbs up. Buses where I live are rubbish, they are always late and only come once every half hour. The only people that get the bus is young people becuase they sang drive and old people because they have a free bus pass
Original post by SnoochToTheBooch
If you live in or near a city you can get public transport, if not then exceptions could be made. If you need hospital, taxi, or if really necessary ambulance. If you want to have fun... get a job. Welfare spending is too big a slice of this pie, especially with our creaking NHS.



Listen here.

EDIT: OK, well done, you separated out pensions. That halves everything.

So 20%, the biggest slice, is housing benefit (i.e. landlord benefit), due to the property bubble - also not the fault of those out of work, in fact they suffer from it.

The next biggest after that, about 16%, is DLA, which you right-wingers pretend you will keep so you can appear compassionate, then you turn around and commit genocide on the disabled.

Wanna know what percentage JSA is?

6% of the total.

Fraud and error?

0.5% of JSA claimants.

Get your priorities straight and stop swallowing the propaganda in the Tory media.

Bullying the unemployed, at a cost of billions, as it has been over this parliament, is hardly going to save the NHS.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Observatory
Living where you want, or where you were born, isn't a necessity.


With what money are you going to effect a move?
Original post by RFowler
I also don't get why some right wingers are supporting it. It is unnecessary intrusion into the lives of citizens which would be very complicated and costly to enforce, not something you'd expect right wingers to be in favour of - they're normally against regulations they consider "unnecessary".


Only for the rich, I'm afraid.

Cut state intrusion on the rich, allow them to privatise profit, hand over assets.

Increase state intrusion on the poor, have them pay for socialised losses, sell off the assets they own via the state.

This is neoliberalism: the fusion of state and global corporate power, set against the people and the small businesses they run.

With all the capital being sucked out of the economy and monopolistic megacorporations choking off much free enterprise, it's testament to the limitless resourcefulness, endeavour, discipline and humanity of the people that people can survive in our economy at all.
Original post by scrotgrot
With what money are you going to effect a move?



This very much someone getting sod all on JSA is unlikely to be able to pay for van hire to move, let alone a deposit or any other fees. Some people really need to take a step back and actually think.
Reply 108
Original post by SophieSmall
This very much someone getting sod all on JSA is unlikely to be able to pay for van hire to move, let alone a deposit or any other fees. Some people really need to take a step back and actually think.


You wouldn't be allowed van hire anyway in this hypothetical - driving is banned :biggrin: You'd have to pay for a removal company!
Original post by samba
You wouldn't be allowed van hire anyway in this hypothetical - driving is banned :biggrin: You'd have to pay for a removal company!


Hahah oh yeah! Good shout! :tongue:
Reply 110
Original post by SophieSmall
I don't for a second believe that is the norm and is likely just an isolated case, especially if you are talking about her getting a higher rate of disability benefit which is ridiculously difficult to get now, many many truly disabled people have had it cut. I should know my mum had hers cut despite the fact I have to bathe and dress her,....but of course she is fit for work.



You'd be amazed the number of people that turn up to showrooms putting on a show.
One dude came in in a wheelchair and was spotted later that evening leathered and dancing around at a club by a colleague.

On another occasion some dude was kicking off that motab wouldn't pay for his car to have leather seats. He was knocking around in an old range rover classic. Had a full on tantrum in the dealership "my range rover has leather so why can't this come with leather" It can if you pay the extra "I'm not paying extra".
"It's to help you get around not to fund a lifestyle". He didn't like being told that...
That particular car ended up sitting on their drive and came back at the end of the term with 300 miles on the clock. They just wanted a new car to flash infront of the neighbours IMHO.

Another lot had come back from spain and had only come back because they were "better off in the UK because benefits gave them more money than his building job".

I can think of loads more chancers just like the above.

I hear people getting shirty saying oh there's only 1.5% of people on benefits that are scroungers. They neatly ignore the fact that the people who supply the statistic are the ones under scrutiny.
I've seen both sides of the fence having taken care of a wheelchair bound grandparent.
There's a hell of a lot of people out there that shouldn't be on the amount of benefits they are on and a hell of a lot more who shouldn't be on it at all.
(edited 9 years ago)
Reply 111
I think its a great idea, imagine all the people that would be employed to spy on claimants to make sure they don't use their cars, it could employ thousands of people who go around monitoring workshy money grabbers and sanction their ass as soon as they go near a car.
Original post by JC.
You'd be amazed the number of people that turn up to showrooms putting on a show.
One dude came in in a wheelchair and was spotted later that evening leathered and dancing around at a club by a colleague.

On another occasion some dude was kicking off that motab wouldn't pay for his car to have leather seats. He was knocking around in an old range rover classic. Had a full on tantrum in the dealership "my range rover has leather so why can't this come with leather" It can if you pay the extra "I'm not paying extra".

Another lot had come back from spain and had only come back because they were "better off in the UK because benefits gave them more money than his building job".

I hear people getting shirty saying oh there's only 1.5% of people on benefits that are scroungers. They neatly ignore the fact that the people who supply the statistic are the ones under scrutiny.
I've seen both sides of the fence having taken care of a wheelchair bound grandparent.
There's a hell of a lot of people out there that shouldn't be on the amount of benefits they are on and a hell of a lot more who shouldn't be on it at all.


I still highly doubt the number of cases which many people think that **** happens.
Reply 113
Original post by SophieSmall
I still highly doubt the number of cases which many people think that **** happens.


I think that's because you're looking at it from the perspective of living with a relative who's genuinely disabled.
Believe me I can totally empathise with you in that I understand what a ball ache it can be to get hold of something so basic like a radar key.

That being said, I don't think you've not seen the other side of the coin. Most genuinely disabled people just want to get on with life with the minimum of fuss and live as close to a normal life as possible.
You can tell the chancers a mile off - they are very quick to use the words "I am entitled to X because of Y Z etc..." They also tend to be quite unpleasant obnoxious people.

Like I said, I've had experience at both ends of the scale. When you genuinely need to get some help for someone it's a nightmare jumping through the hoops that are put in your path. Similarly, it's hard to bite your tongue when you deal with certain individuals that have managed to con their way through the system.
Original post by JC.
I think that's because you're looking at it from the perspective of living with a relative who's genuinely disabled.
Believe me I can totally empathise with you in that I understand what a ball ache it can be to get hold of something so basic like a radar key.

That being said, I don't think you've not seen the other side of the coin. Most genuinely disabled people just want to get on with life with the minimum of fuss and live as close to a normal life as possible.
You can tell the chancers a mile off - they are very quick to use the words "I am entitled to X because of Y Z etc..." They also tend to be quite unpleasant obnoxious people.

Like I said, I've had experience at both ends of the scale. When you genuinely need to get some help for someone it's a nightmare jumping through the hoops that are put in your path. Similarly, it's hard to bite your tongue when you deal with certain individuals that have managed to con their way through the system.


I have also experiences the opposite end of the spectrum, I knew a right scum bag on my street (don't live in a great area) who was faking disability along with her husband, they both had it taken off them as they couldn't provide sufficient doctors evidence of their disability and they didn't gain enough points on the ATOS check list.

Again, I don't believe for a second there is a statistically significant number abusing the disability system.
Original post by JC.
You'd be amazed the number of people that turn up to showrooms putting on a show.
One dude came in in a wheelchair and was spotted later that evening leathered and dancing around at a club by a colleague.

On another occasion some dude was kicking off that motab wouldn't pay for his car to have leather seats. He was knocking around in an old range rover classic. Had a full on tantrum in the dealership "my range rover has leather so why can't this come with leather" It can if you pay the extra "I'm not paying extra".
"It's to help you get around not to fund a lifestyle". He didn't like being told that...
That particular car ended up sitting on their drive and came back at the end of the term with 300 miles on the clock. They just wanted a new car to flash infront of the neighbours IMHO.

Another lot had come back from spain and had only come back because they were "better off in the UK because benefits gave them more money than his building job".

I can think of loads more chancers just like the above.

I hear people getting shirty saying oh there's only 1.5% of people on benefits that are scroungers. They neatly ignore the fact that the people who supply the statistic are the ones under scrutiny.
I've seen both sides of the fence having taken care of a wheelchair bound grandparent.
There's a hell of a lot of people out there that shouldn't be on the amount of benefits they are on and a hell of a lot more who shouldn't be on it at all.


Even if this were true, it is a small price to pay to ensure the vulnerable are protected. You would remove the safety net for everyone just to punish someone for wanting leather seats in his car.

Is it really worth getting so worked up over?

Today there has just been a new quantitative easing programme announced by the ECB. All those banks getting handed European taxpayers' money by the state to prop up their balance sheets. Our quantitative easing was enough to have given every household, disabled or able, prince or pauper, £11,000 over five years. Every penny would have gone into the economy rather than into that of the Cayman Islands.

And you're more concerned about someone trying to blag leather seats in his car. I'm sure you're very reasonable, but I'm afraid you're part of the problem if you think like that.

If you reply that there's no way to pin the rich down, especially while only taking down the bad guys, you're right. But there's no way to cut benefits while only taking down the bad guys either. A lot of people will be stuck wasting away in their houses if Motability is rescinded due to lurid tales of fraud.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by scrotgrot
Because the governance of the country is not all about you.

If I give you my paypal account email address, will you send me some money?

No?

Then why should I "give" money to somebody who doesn't work so they can buy a car?
Original post by alapa
So they can drive to job interviews, get a job, pay for your usage of the roads and the NHS. In some parts of the country driving is vital... Not a luxury at all. Plus having a car and a license would make someone more employable.

So basically all you are saying is we should make it harder for people to find work.... Because you don't want to pay for them to drive?

But what if they never get a job? I am just paying for them to have a car.....
Original post by scrotgrot
All those banks getting handed European taxpayers' money by the state to prop up their balance sheets.


You clearly don't understand QE if you think its to prop-up bank balance sheets.......
I don't want to pay the ridiculous rates of income tax in place for layabouts to drive, just as I don't want to pay for layabouts to have spare bedrooms.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending