Are you beginning with poetry? Oh wow, we’re literally testing the waters of AO2 and AO3 with our Shakespeare play (
Hamlet) and our first book from our selected genre of fiction (dystopia;
1984). By the by, we’re both with OCR.
Speaking of my man Orwell and his divine dystopia fiction of
1984. I was met with some mind-bending bewilderment upon receiving feedback telling me to ‘[embed] quotes,’ despite the fact we were told that it wasn’t really that relevant to the marking criteria for the actual exam or our homework! Anyway, I wasn’t too fussed, the following feedback states:
‘WWW: Well done Tolga some excellent analysis of the first chapter and how the Government have power in the text. Really lovely focus on the key elements that Orwell has embedded and the impact on the reader. EBI (Specify which assessment objective to focus on): NEXT- You need to embed quotations into your writing as in places it is narrative where you explain what is happening. The use of quotes will help focus your analysis on specific sections of the text.’ The EBI wasn’t a diatribe, or didn’t read as such. That was until I found out a multitude of remarks of the most scathing and brutal variety scalding my first-time efforts of analysing literature to an A-level standard on the Word document. She savagely ravaged my piece, dissected and dismantled my analysis and buried me as well.
If you had literary devices in mind, then you would have been in for a shock with A-level English language. Already after the first lesson, the disparity between this course and its GCSE counterpart is so conspicuous, but also so staggering to the point that it’s truly baffling. In essence, it chooses to delve into the ‘theory behind language,’ along also exploring the elements of the English language’s evolution, in lieu of writing imaginative and creative prose or persuasive, transactional texts and performing close-reading analysis on fiction and non-fictional excerpts. A whole portion course is literally a GCSE history thematic study called ‘language through time’. That’s not to say it’s bad though. What is, on the other hand, is the fact that we’ll be subjected to baseline assessment next week --
I'm preparing for joyous times ahead! No seriously though,
disgusting. According to some really shaky assumptions predicated on short comments by our teacher, the test connotes the contents of the first lesson (we’ve been left in the dark with regards to the minutiae of the assessment’s contents). ****.
P.S. I’m also thinking of changing my style with inverted commas to the more commonly used British English convention of placing the punctuation outside of the inverted commas. It just seems more rational to me. I only every usually put the punctuation outside the inverted commas if the content is the title of something, unless the punctuation is in the title. It’s a deeply entrenched habit that I'm a little paranoid about. Lol. This was a good laugh.