Turn on thread page Beta

Corbyn Briefed Communist Spies in Cold War watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/558116...war-briefings/

    Labour have denied that he supplied 'privileged' information, which is a rather specific turn of phrase.

    What's surprising is that it isn't surprising. Eagerly awaiting young trots telling me that we've heard it all before and that the British people don't care whether their leaders consistently support this country's enemies or not. Yawn. Your man is a scumbag.
    Online

    13
    ReputationRep:
    I’m sure Jezza opppses the violence done on both sides and was acting as a peace envoy.

    If it hadn’t have been for his stringent efforts I’m sure the earth would be an irradiated husk by now 😂
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Obviously a silly story, no one would identify themselves as a spy. The whole point of being a spy is no one knows you are a spy. It would be stupid for any communist spy to tell Corbyn they were a spy in case he was a double agent or an informer for MI5.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Maker)
    Obviously a silly story, no one would identify themselves as a spy. The whole point of being a spy is no one knows you are a spy. It would be stupid for any communist spy to tell Corbyn they were a spy in case he was a double agent or an informer for MI5.
    I think the point is that his counter-claim, that he was going around meeting a Czech 'diplomat' without expecting them to report their meetings back upstairs, is extraordinarily naive even to the extent which it's believable.
    Online

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rinsed)
    I think the point is that his counter-claim, that he was going around meeting a Czech 'diplomat' without expecting them to report their meetings back upstairs, is extraordinarily naive even to the extent which it's believable.
    3/10 trolling.

    It's an absolutely ridiculous smear and it's no surprise to see the source 'reporting it'. Let's be honest here, not even you believe the drivel written in the article Nor do you care. Instead of debating or discussing points, your side seems intent on just labeling anyone they disagree with as a 'terrorist sympathiser/traitor/trot' etc. Throw enough sh*t at the wall and hope some sticks. Some things don't change.

    This is SJW type stuff from you.

    My favorite line in the article is that 'Corbyn was described as having negative views about the policies of the Conservative government...'

    A Labour party figure negative about the Tories? Hold the front page...
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    Not gunna lie the sun is about as reputable as that guy down my street who thinks the government are enlarging his genitals using beams from his tv
    Online

    19
    ReputationRep:
    If this is true we have to question his motives.

    Is it peace? Well possibly, but at the same time we have to remember he was in no position to peruse peace. He was a backbench opposition Mp who was basically unknown outside Islington.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Azraall)
    Not gunna lie the sun is about as reputable as that guy down my street who thinks the government are enlarging his genitals using beams from his tv
    I always enjoy the fingers-in-the-ears play from idiots whenever a verifiable news story comes from a source they don't like.

    The fact is that Corbyn's team have basically confirmed the story. They claim he was meeting a 'diplomat' with no idea at all he might be reporting their meetings. But then the best case scenario is that he was exceptionally foolish.
    Online

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rinsed)
    I always enjoy the fingers-in-the-ears play from idiots whenever a verifiable news story comes from a source they don't like.

    The fact is that Corbyn's team have basically confirmed the story. They claim he was meeting a 'diplomat' with no idea at all he might be reporting their meetings. But then the best case scenario is that he was exceptionally foolish.
    Exactly, a spy isn’t exactly going to say that they’re a spy are they? With the possible exception of James Bond.

    The sun may have a reputation for sensationilism. But not outright lying surely? There’s a difference.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DeBruyne18)
    3/10 trolling.

    It's an absolutely ridiculous smear and it's no surprise to see the source 'reporting it'. Let's be honest here, not even you believe the drivel written in the article Nor do you care. Instead of debating or discussing points, your side seems intent on just labeling anyone they disagree with as a 'terrorist sympathiser/traitor/trot' etc. Throw enough sh*t at the wall and hope some sticks. Some things don't change.



    This is SJW type stuff from you.

    My favorite line in the article is that 'Corbyn was described as having negative views about the policies of the Conservative government...'

    A Labour party figure negative about the Tories? Hold the front page...
    Not even Corbyn's team are denying the story outright, they're just claiming he had no idea what was going on around him.

    I'm sorry you don't like it when people report that Corbyn supported the USSR/IRA/Hezbollah/Iran/Venezuelan government but the stories are absolutely not all based on lies as your side always tries to claim. There is a good deal of fact backing this up and it mystifies me that you lot can stick your collective heads in the sand so.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Andrew97)
    Exactly, a spy isn’t exactly going to say that they’re a spy are they? With the possible exception of James Bond.

    The sun may have a reputation for sensationilism. But not outright lying surely? There’s a difference.
    You would be surprised. People here are frequently willing to deny anything in the Sun's pages is true even in the face of corroborating evidence. It's pathological.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    So 32 years ago Jeremy Corbyn met a Czech diplomat who was possible a spy. And that's the best they can come up with?
    No fraudulent expenses claims? No secret donations from Russian oligarchs? No running down the NHS while owning shares in private healthcare providers?

    The ultimate irony is that a 'shock' story about foreign agents trying to influence British politicians should appear in a newspaper owned by Rupert Murdoch, a foreigner who has spent the last 30 years trying to influence British politicians.
    Online

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rinsed)
    Not even Corbyn's team are denying the story outright, they're just claiming he had no idea what was going on around him.

    I'm sorry you don't like it when people report that Corbyn supported the USSR/IRA/Hezbollah/Iran/Venezuelan government but the stories are absolutely not all based on lies as your side always tries to claim. There is a good deal of fact backing this up and it mystifies me that you lot can stick your collective heads in the sand so.
    Of course they have denied it.

    It's just the usual Murdoch smear, the best way to deal with them is not to acknowledge them and give their lies any degree of credibility by taking them seriously.

    Indeed the article you linked posts not one bit of evidence to back up that Corbyn was giving our secrets to or meeting with a known spy.

    You don't really care about this at all, nor do you believe it. It's akin to SJW pretending to take offence at everything. This outrage culture on both sides is really quite tiresome.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DeBruyne18)
    Of course they have denied it.

    It's just the usual Murdoch smear, the best way to deal with them is not to acknowledge them and give their lies any degree of credibility by taking them seriously.

    Indeed the article you linked posts not one bit of evidence to back up that Corbyn was giving our secrets to or meeting with a known spy.

    You don't really care about this at all, nor do you believe it. It's akin to SJW pretending to take offence at everything. This outrage culture on both sides is really quite tiresome.
    Never any words from them on Saudi Arabia, Saddam's Iraq, Pol Pot, the Mujaheddin/Al Qaeda/ISIS, Unionist paramilitaries,etc. ... are there :laugh:

    Maybe Corbyn is responsible for those too!?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Here are some more reputable news sources if people insist on ignoring the Sun:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-Cold-War.html
    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/poli...-a3767561.html
    https://www.express.co.uk/news/world...gence-services
    Online

    19
    ReputationRep:
    I doubt he will accept those.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Oh, but here's a news site defending Corbyn:

    https://www.rt.com/uk/418870-war-spies-corbyn-meeting/
    Online

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rinsed)
    Oh, but here's a news site defending Corbyn:

    https://www.rt.com/uk/418870-war-spies-corbyn-meeting/
    RT 😂😂. What next? The canary?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DeBruyne18)
    Of course they have denied it.

    It's just the usual Murdoch smear, the best way to deal with them is not to acknowledge them and give their lies any degree of credibility by taking them seriously.

    Indeed the article you linked posts not one bit of evidence to back up that Corbyn was giving our secrets to or meeting with a known spy.

    You don't really care about this at all, nor do you believe it. It's akin to SJW pretending to take offence at everything. This outrage culture on both sides is really quite tiresome.
    They have denied he gave this 'diplomat' any 'privileged' information.

    That is far from a full-throated denial of the story.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Andrew97)
    RT 😂😂. What next? The canary?
    Oh, I'm quite sure the Canary are busy penning an article which claims Corbyn was single-handedly negotiating a peace-agreement with the Soviets.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: February 24, 2018
Poll
How are you feeling in the run-up to Results Day 2018?
Useful resources

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.