The Student Room Group

The Manchester United Thread XXIII

Reserved

What better way to open a new Man Utd thread than a Liverpool fan posting about a 4-2 win at Old Trafford.

Although that is what happens when you play a reserve side due to fixture congestion.

Thoughts @bj27 ?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

What an absolute prick :rofl:

Reply 2

We go into the new thread with Manchester United only 10 points ahead of Liverpool now after tonight’s result... Oh no. :laugh:

Reply 3

Original post by IanDangerously
We go into the new thread with Manchester United only 10 points ahead of Liverpool now after tonight’s result... Oh no. :laugh:


We have a game in hand :teeth:

For as good as Man Utd have been this season / sitting in 2nd for a lot of this season - still only going at 2 points per game. Do you believe OGS and this squad can make the jump to 90+ points in a season, that is likely to be required to win a league title?

Reply 4

Original post by Zerforax
We have a game in hand :teeth:

For as good as Man Utd have been this season / sitting in 2nd for a lot of this season - still only going at 2 points per game. Do you believe OGS and this squad can make the jump to 90+ points in a season, that is likely to be required to win a league title?

City can't even get 90 points this season.

For all the talk of how good city have been they wouldn't win the title in any of the previous 4 seadons

Reply 5

If we don't strengthen defense and mid-field we will struggle to get 4th place next season.
No point in having strong forwards if they hardly get the ball.

Chelsea & L'pool under-achieved, 2nd place flatters us but gives the opportunity of getting at least 2-3 quality players.

Reply 6

City can't even get 90 points this season.

For all the talk of how good city have been they wouldn't win the title in any of the previous 4 seadons


Yea I did think mid-80 points would be enough to win the title this season with everything going on.

Reply 7

If we don't strengthen defense and mid-field we will struggle to get 4th place next season.
No point in having strong forwards if they hardly get the ball.

Chelsea & L'pool under-achieved, 2nd place flatters us but gives the opportunity of getting at least 2-3 quality players.


Thought Dean Henderson was poor last night. Put his team under pressure with passes, didn't impose on the game. Poor blocking to stop TAA shot by spilling into Firmino's path and his positioning for Salah's goal was awful (left side of goal entirely exposed), nevermind that he probably should've come off his line.

Reply 8

City can't even get 90 points this season.

For all the talk of how good city have been they wouldn't win the title in any of the previous 4 seadons

The previous 4 seasons didn't have a global pandemic, short preseason, condensed fixtures and a lack of fans though (bar last season but over 2/3s of it was already played pre covid). Reckon it'll be back to 90 next season.
(edited 4 years ago)

Reply 9

Original post by samir12
The previous 4 seasons didn't have a global pandemic, short preseason, condensed fixtures and a lack of fans though (bar last season but over 2/3s of it was already played pre covid). Reckon it'll be back to 90 next season.


Can see this Man City side spending 200mil this summer and then setting over 100 points next season..

Reply 10

Hello @difeo

Which football player is Luke?

I was thinking maybe Fabianski?

Reply 11

Would be very Man Utd to buy Kane or Lukaku this summer.

Reply 12

Original post by zKlown
Hello @difeo

Which football player is Luke?

I was thinking maybe Fabianski?

White Emile Heskey

Reply 13

Original post by Zerforax
Would be very Man Utd to buy Kane or Lukaku this summer.

Would love them to drop £100m on Lukaku.

I must admit, I’d be very hesitant as a club to look to drop £150m on Kane. Obviously he guarantees goals but there is a big concern that his ankles have him out for 4-6 weeks minimum every season and they are only going to get worse.

Reply 14

Original post by Mess.
Would love them to drop £100m on Lukaku.

I must admit, I’d be very hesitant as a club to look to drop £150m on Kane. Obviously he guarantees goals but there is a big concern that his ankles have him out for 4-6 weeks minimum every season and they are only going to get worse.


buying Lukaku for 100m would be so jokes but he'd do well for them.

them buying Kane is a problem as they have Cavani to make up for when Kane is out who is more than capable.

It's different to Spurs.

Kane is overvalued but United can afford that
(edited 4 years ago)

Reply 15

buying Lukaku for 100m would be so jokes but he'd do well for them.

them buying Kane is a problem as they have Cavani to make up for when Kane is out who is more than capable.

It's different to Spurs.

Kane is overvalued but United can afford that

No way we buy Kane this summer and if we somehow manage to it means we've blown our transfer budget and neglected more urgent areas (obviously as you said Cavani signed so it's not urgent anymore).

Reply 16

Original post by Dirtybit
No way we buy Kane this summer and if we somehow manage to it means we've blown our transfer budget and neglected more urgent areas (obviously as you said Cavani signed so it's not urgent anymore).


Well Woodward going so maybe he won't do any more crazy overpriced signings.

Reply 17

Are you going to bother with tonight's game . . . already relegated Fulham against already qualified ManU was a big game coming up?

Chelsea Leicester is the want to watch of Chelsea don't win Liverpool go hrough . . Squeaky bum time for some, we can relax

Reply 18

What's gonna happen with Bale & Bellingham?

Reply 19

Bruno touched that!

Quick Reply