Recently my main bank account at Barclays was closed down without warning. I contacted them and they wouldn't say anything. Nothing on my credit score either. After digging around a bit I found out about Cifas markers and made a subject access request. I received the response today and sure enough I've got a Cifas mark entered by an insurance group representing a tenancy reference agency. The reason for filing says altered documents and case type: false application. I'm assuming this is cat 7?
This reminded me last year when I had to find a new place to rent I failed one of my reference application (it was with homelet). They had contacted my employer and landlord and both of had confirmed they had, I also had to give them a lot of information (6 months banks statement and payslips) All of these were legitimate documents not altered in any way. They failed me and all the letting agency could say it was something about them not being able to confirm my address but I just had to suck it up and find another place (i did and passed as usual) while still losing half of my holding deposit.... marked it down as a bad experience and to just avoid them (also because they would flood me with calls selling their insurance).
Now I find almost a year later they have filed a Cifas marker against me and I've lost my main bank account because of this, and apparently this can lead me to lose my other bank account and prevent me from mortgage or future tenancy or a job in financial sector once I graduate, basically screwing me completely for 6 years....
Is this possible to challenge? I've read around here and most seem to be about cat 6 cifas markers and the consensus is no, is this case different? I just cannot imagine that something as arbitrary as someone not liking my tenancy reference application can screw me over this bad