My teacher keeps giving me consistently similar marks, what can I do to improve? I've attached it below, any feedback will be super helpful, thanks in advance!:
To what extent were British governments successful in dealing with the problems facing the economy in the years 1924 to 1939? (25 marks):
From 1924 to 1939, the British government introduced several measures to help deal with the economy, as it was in a difficult position following a decline in staple industries after the first world war due to a lack of investment and increasing foreign competition from the USA and Germany. The issues of unemployment, industrial action and the Great depression of 1929 all contributed to problems faced by the UK government, which in turn implemented several measures with the aim of reducing the impact these challenges had on the country. The 1931 National coalition strived to make the government more effective in a time of crisis and the Conservative subsidy for miners in 1926 aimed to reduce the impact of a strikes by sustaining wages. However, although these methods looked like they were positive in combatting the problems facing the economy, they never completely satisfied the British people, and it could be argued that the only reason Governments decided to help people was because they wanted to sustain party support without upsetting the newly enfranchised voters. Consequently, the British government may not have been successful at dealing with the problems faced by the economy in the years between 1924 and 1939.
In 1926, Stanley Balwin and the Government can be viewed as successfully aiming to tackle economic issues after they pledged a nine – month subsidy in order to stop the TUC and miners going on strike over 13% cuts in there wages and increasing working hours from 7 to 8 hours. For the time period it was enacted, this subsidy could be classed as successful in dealing with the problem of increasing structural unemployment in staple industries because it kept miners in work despite to foreign competition forcing mines to close more frequently. This was also successful at sustaining increasing standards of living amongst the working classes, as demonstrated by the birth rate falling due to less need for several children to bring money in to households. Additionally, this subsidy was also beneficial as it helped calm the rising power of trade unionism, which was causing general anxiety in government, because strikes such as the Red Clyside strike in Glasgow was enticing the ‘’red scare’’, where workers were flying communist flags, which increased fear of revolution like in Russia a few years prior. Baldwin’s ability to follow this up with calling for employers to stop cuts can also be considered successful in handling the problems facing the economy because it helped to keep some wealth in industrial towns, such as Brimingham, Newcastle and Manchester, which was particularly influential as these areas were suffering from rising poverty, as reinforced by 30% of people living below the poverty line by the late 1920s. Living standards were improved on a national scale at this time, and although this was not the primary cause and the 9 month subsidy was not sustainable, the acts of the Conservative government in 1926 were useful at showing that the government was committed to dealing with challenges to the economy, as it successfully attempted to stop unemployment in the staple industry of mining.
Five years later, in 1931, the Government also tried to successfully tackle economic problems when Ramsey Macdonald called for a National government to form under the instruction of the King. This was much more successful than the subsidy of 1926 to hopefully curve a general strike because it removed party barriers, which were stopping the government from implementing effective policy to tackle economic issues. This clearly helped deal with problems as it helped the Macdonald to raise taxes and cut employment benefits without going against the morals of the Labour party, as they had expelled him for not being a ‘man of the people’ after he decided to lead the national coalition. Furthermore, Stanley Baldwin’s willingness to enter this coalition because he did not want the Conservatives to be branded as ‘the party that taxes the poor’’ also shows this measure was the most successful at tackling the economic challenges because it allowed for Parliament to act most cooperatively and effectively after the Great depression, which had worked 15 years prior in the wartime coalition. In consequence, the National coalition could be considered the most successful way of handling economic challenges because it helped stopping of the Great Depression causing severely negative impacts on unemployment levels, as they had reduced by 1939 despite being averaged at 17% instead of 14% like pre – war unemployment levels.
The government’s various Acts and reforms, however, contained many failures in attempting to deal with the economic challenges presented between 1924 and 1939. After the 9 month subsidy for miners in 1926 ended, employers in the sector refused to raise their wages in order to satisfy the demands of the TUC. This shows that the subsidy for miners workers was unsuccessful in the long term, as the government had provided an unsustainable solution to the issue of decline in the staple industries causing unemployment because regardless of their efforts, a general strike occurred in May 1926 due to 1 million miners being locked out of work due to refusal to accept cuts. This measure did little to deal with the economic problems faced by the government, as all this subsidy achieved was ‘kicking the can down the road’ and prolonging the imminent occurrence of a general strike and structural unemployment due to less industry. The National Coalition of 1931 again failed to properly address the issue of unemployment, which was a key economic issue in the inter war years, because their inability to effectively handle the Great Depression of 1929 resulted in a peak of over 3,000,000 people being unemployed by 1933. In reality, National government failed to reduce the pressing issue of unemployment and make Britain more competitive against foreign competitors, such as the USA, resulting in Baldwin having to introduce protectionism in 1934, highlighting the ineffectiveness of the National Government as Britain was in a much worse position economically after it because tariffs needed to be introduced to keep domestic industry alive. The government completely failed to handle the problems surrounding the economy effectively.
In Conclusion, the British government were unsuccessful in their measures against economic challenges by 1939. The National government of 1931 did help to allow for more radical reform, such as higher taxation in order to combat growing debt and a falling GDP, but all this really achieved was pushing 40% of those working in staple industries into poverty, as they now had poorer pay or no employment at all and even the introduction of unemployment benefits and ‘dole money’ could not combat this, as the Means Test was so difficult to pass and inaccurate. By 1939, a large proportion of economic issues, such as unemployment were significantly worse than before 1924, as reinforced by the average unemployment rate rarely dipping below 1,000,000 and the Economy taking until 1933 to recover to the pre – war rate of 1913. The National Government only lasted 3 years because of it’s ineffectiveness to deal with these policies in 1933, leading to the British government being far from successful when trying to deal with economic challenges.