Donald Trump becomes president today

I usually like Sam, but he's being daft about the unmitigated horror of the Trump Presidency.

This will be an interesting 4 years for america

Obama had a supermajority in the first two years of his first term and still didn't get as much done because he wanted to accommodate the Republicans, even when he landslided.

Shortly before the President Trump took office, Mexico has had its very first school shooting, in an American school no less. Hopefully, the Emmy nominee will stop American culture from spreading outside of the country.

If only the wall could stop American guns from flooding into Mexico and Americans from taking drugs.

What, in your mind, would such an objective description consist of?

This isn't a rhetorical question, I genuinely want to hear it.

Two years? The Republicans took control of the House in 2010, Obama had just under a year to pass what he could before the Republicans filibustered everything. In the time he had, he did a lot.

I don't think there is such a thing as a totally objective description. Any more than there is totally objective history.

All journalists report through the perspective of their own political beliefs and values it seems to me.

The challenge we have now is that the entire mainstream journalistic profession report a world which is under post liberal assault, from the same, liberal perspective.

It isn't just that it lacks any objectivity at all, although of course it does, but that they just don't understand it. How can you effectively describe something when you don't have the first clue what is going on?

I don't think there is such a thing as a totally objective description. Any more than there is totally objective history.

All journalists report through the perspective of their own political beliefs and values it seems to me.

The challenge we have now is that the entire mainstream journalistic profession report a world which is under post liberal assault, from the same, liberal perspective.

It isn't just that it lacks any objectivity at all, although of course it does, but that they just don't understand it. How can you effectively describe something when you don't have the first clue what is going on?

Trump's IQ is high, ones of the highest in fact and that's why he won so bigly.

You do realise he's saying "big league" and not bigly. So many liberals on facebook were mocking him because of this but failed to comprehend an accent.

Dat awkward moment when you pollute the resistance with unnecessary violence....

January 2009 to November 2010 is closer to 2 years than just under a year.

Trumped claimed his inauguration crowd stretched back to Washington monument. That is an easily falsifiable claim. One that has been proved to be false. Yet Trump's press spoke team keep claiming it is true.

Male violence is a core part of Spencers' ideology. So it seems only fitting to respond with some male leftist direct action to the face.

This is the guy who suggested we should consider the genocide of blacks. I'm sorry but you deal with that straight away. Waiting until it is too late and we have to do world war 2 again is not a valid option. You snuff it out as soon as possible, even if that means violence. That black woman stood behind him in that interview? He would eradicate her gene pool if he could. **** him and hope he is scared. Tolerance of genocidal racists if for useless liberals/conservatives you would let fascism get to the point where it is too late.

Also... punching Nazis works.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/21/us/politics/richard-spencer-punched-attack.html?&moduleDetail=section-news-1&action=click&contentCollection=Politics&region=Footer&module=MoreInSection&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext&pgtype=article

Regardless of your side of the divide... ultra left, left, right, ultra right... hitting someone who is not attacking you is .....Dat awkward moment when you pollute the resistance with unnecessary violence.