The Student Room Group

Anyone else struggling to integrate with working class people?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 40
Original post by Ripper-Roo
I think the attitudes some parents have can be disruptive to children, like don't mix with Tyler because his mum is a chav. I'll be sending my children to state schools because I want them to make friends with people based on their own attributes, not because their parents are on benefits. Hardly the child's fault.

I agree with you, if you're born poor, there should be nothing stopping you from getting rich...

I think social mobility was much higher in the 1960s-70s etc, not now, because of the lack of jobs. I'm not defeatist, if I have a goal I am determined to achieve, but I do want to be richer than my parents are. It may take a long time though.


Agreed. I'll be sending mine to a grammar or private school, my experience of comprehensive was less than stellar. They will however learn the value of money, i have no intention of spoiling them and i will make them get a part time job at 16.

I think it was relatively but that's because we've seen a huge expansion of the middle class since so there's simply less people intelligent enough to climb the social ladder that are of the working classes at the moment. Certainly i have seen little to impede my progress. The job problem should also be short term, until 2008 the job market was as good as it had been since the 70's.
Reply 41
Original post by Rakas21
Agreed. I'll be sending mine to a grammar or private school, my experience of comprehensive was less than stellar. They will however learn the value of money, i have no intention of spoiling them and i will make them get a part time job at 16.

I think it was relatively but that's because we've seen a huge expansion of the middle class since so there's simply less people intelligent enough to climb the social ladder that are of the working classes at the moment. Certainly i have seen little to impede my progress. The job problem should also be short term, until 2008 the job market was as good as it had been since the 70's.


The UK has put all its eggs into one basket re the service sector. Manufacturing gave the working class jobs, now they either have to join the university system or get low paid menial jobs in retail or cleaning. Apprenticeships are a good idea though. Sons of electricians and plumbers I know are doing well too because they will own their fathers' companies one day.
Reply 42
Original post by Swanbow
On the contrary I'm struggling to integrate with middle class people.


Some can be really whiny and childish don't you think?
Reply 43
Original post by Ripper-Roo
The UK has put all its eggs into one basket re the service sector. Manufacturing gave the working class jobs, now they either have to join the university system or get low paid menial jobs in retail or cleaning. Apprenticeships are a good idea though. Sons of electricians and plumbers I know are doing well too because they will own their fathers' companies one day.


For the most part, yes. Although it's worth baring in mind that the service sector is still quite diverse. I do agree with moves to expand manufacturing though.
Reply 44
Original post by Rakas21
For the most part, yes. Although it's worth baring in mind that the service sector is still quite diverse. I do agree with moves to expand manufacturing though.


Missed out call centres :tongue: For me I think the UK was functioning better in the 90s and early 00s, because of Labour.
I have a harder time integrating with the middle class tbh...
Reply 46
Original post by Ripper-Roo
Missed out call centres :tongue: For me I think the UK was functioning better in the 90s and early 00s, because of Labour.


The Tories left Labour the best economic conditions in around a century. Growth was high, inflation was low, unemployment was collapsing. Labour simply stuck to the plan, especially in the first term.

And legal, finance, consultancy and accounting are all service.
Reply 47
Original post by Rakas21
The Tories left Labour the best economic conditions in around a century. Growth was high, inflation was low, unemployment was collapsing. Labour simply stuck to the plan, especially in the first term.

And legal, finance, consultancy and accounting are all service.


I don't know much about 1980s economic history but I think the average person is best with Labour.

But they require qualifications/experience, I meant menial jobs working class people typically take.
Reply 48
Original post by Ripper-Roo
I don't know much about 1980s economic history but I think the average person is best with Labour.

But they require qualifications/experience, I meant menial jobs working class people typically take.


I was talking about post-1992 (the Major government). I don't think the average person is much worse off under either over the long term. Indeed, bar a few headline messages the message from Balls is that he will stick to the Tory plan. For every working tax credit Labour will throw at you, the Tories will throw you a share issue like Royal Mail, the right to buy ect.. or soon to be the banks and BBC so as long as Labour don't go back to their policies in the 70's i don't see much difference for the average person. Both are firmly subscribed to the Thatcherite consensus.

Fair point.
Reply 49
Original post by Rakas21
I was talking about post-1992 (the Major government). I don't think the average person is much worse off under either over the long term. Indeed, bar a few headline messages the message from Balls is that he will stick to the Tory plan. For every working tax credit Labour will throw at you, the Tories will throw you a share issue like Royal Mail, the right to buy ect.. or soon to be the banks and BBC so as long as Labour don't go back to their policies in the 70's i don't see much difference for the average person. Both are firmly subscribed to the Thatcherite consensus.

Fair point.


Only because of FPTP as it's electorally safe and most voters like the middle ground (not that Thatcher was middle ground, but Blair is between left Labour and Thatcher) or continuity. More marginal parties or views aren't represented because of majoritarian system.
Reply 50
Original post by Ripper-Roo
Only because of FPTP as it's electorally safe and most voters like the middle ground (not that Thatcher was middle ground, but Blair is between left Labour and Thatcher) or continuity. More marginal parties or views aren't represented because of majoritarian system.


The center ground is relative, Blair was in the context of absolute terms a mild Thatcherite and Miliband is certainly no hard socialist being somewhere between Blair and Kinnock. Today center ground is so far right because as you say the political system locks it in and also because the middle classes like rising asset values and there are lots of them.
Reply 51
This is not aimed at anyone particular here btw

We're all living in the same country and one 'group' find it hard just humanly communicating with the other

I dont see why anyone should have a list of rules in order to be around someone else to feel more at ease.
Maybe if we all interacted more we wouldnt need instructions and expectations especially since there being no actual reason for a difference.
Anyone middle class in britain still has no excuse to be so ignorant to most of the country's population.
Yet its this 'group' facing consequences everyday that get on with it because theyve learned to live without a back up plan/bank account day by day.
And dont assume theyre just fine after this, that 'things may be a little tight but they get by' because you know what most of them dont.
That does not make them peasants, thats not the definition of poor, thats real life. And real life does not differ between person to person. Im not adjusting your world around you so you dont feel im a nuissance coz quite frankly ive limitted care about whats a nuissance to you and whats a nuissance to me.
Its weird. Theres not that much difference between middle and working but at yet the same time theyre being treated more and more differently and good luck to that.
Posted from TSR Mobile
(edited 10 years ago)
Reply 52
Original post by Ripper-Roo
Some can be really whiny and childish don't you think?


I just find the whole 'keeping up appearances' thing tedious. I really don't care which school you attended, what your father's job was and how often you go skiing or which third world country you saved during your 'gap-yah'. Even worse is when they try act all 'ghetto' and 'urban', so cringe worthy. Also the pretentiousness of some people, ergh.

It isn't fair to judge people by class though. Not all middle class people are like that, but struggle to get along with those who are. Was a bit of a culture shock coming to university and meeting people like that, I thought it was just a caricature. The middle class people I knew back home just seemed a lot more down to earth.
Reply 53
Original post by Swanbow
I just find the whole 'keeping up appearances' thing tedious. I really don't care which school you attended, what your father's job was and how often you go skiing or which third world country you saved during your 'gap-yah'. Even worse is when they try act all 'ghetto' and 'urban', so cringe worthy. Also the pretentiousness of some people, ergh.

It isn't fair to judge people by class though. Not all middle class people are like that, but struggle to get along with those who are. Was a bit of a culture shock coming to university and meeting people like that, I thought it was just a caricature. The middle class people I knew back home just seemed a lot more down to earth.


Agree - it's just keeping up appearances and it's not impressive!

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending