Go to first unread
Back
to top
A level History AQA Angevins 3A 10th June
Watch
Announcements
what do we think will come up?
and do you think it is worth revising synoptic topics
and do you think it is worth revising synoptic topics
0
reply
Report
#2
(Original post by MMMMM22)
what do we think will come up?
and do you think it is worth revising synoptic topics
what do we think will come up?
and do you think it is worth revising synoptic topics
0
reply
Report
#4
(Original post by questiron)
do you have any guesses for the breadth question?
do you have any guesses for the breadth question?
0
reply
Report
#5
I reckon a synoptic Magna Carta question might come up, and I'm praying for a Great Rebellion or Becket. Although if destabilisation under Richard, or even success of his reign would be okay 😊
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#6
(Original post by OwlMagic153)
I reckon a synoptic Magna Carta question might come up, and I'm praying for a Great Rebellion or Becket. Although if destabilisation under Richard, or even success of his reign would be okay 😊
Posted from TSR Mobile
I reckon a synoptic Magna Carta question might come up, and I'm praying for a Great Rebellion or Becket. Although if destabilisation under Richard, or even success of his reign would be okay 😊
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#7
What sort of a Becket question could come up though, apart from whether the dispute was caused by personality or principles?
0
reply
Report
#8
(Original post by j21600)
What sort of a Becket question could come up though, apart from whether the dispute was caused by personality or principles?
What sort of a Becket question could come up though, apart from whether the dispute was caused by personality or principles?
'The consequences of Thomas Becket's death were a victory for King Henry II.' Assess the validity of this view with reference to the years 1170 to 1179.
This was on the first ever paper.
0
reply
Report
#9
I'd really like for a consequences question to come up, like if it was a victory for Henry or the Church, but I suppose causes wouldn't be too bad.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#10
Has anyone got any ideas for a synoptic Church question? I've been trying to plan it but haven't got very far...
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#11
(Original post by OwlMagic153)
Has anyone got any ideas for a synoptic Church question? I've been trying to plan it but haven't got very far...
Posted from TSR Mobile
Has anyone got any ideas for a synoptic Church question? I've been trying to plan it but haven't got very far...
Posted from TSR Mobile
'The Angevin Kings were successful in achieving their aims in relation to the English Church in the years 1154 to 1216.' Assess the validity of this view.
Usually they seem to take the same idea and format of the questions and just put a different angle on it, so they might say they were not successful and to assess that.
0
reply
Report
#12
(Original post by Charliefen)
Well the only one that has come up is:
'The Angevin Kings were successful in achieving their aims in relation to the English Church in the years 1154 to 1216.' Assess the validity of this view.
Usually they seem to take the same idea and format of the questions and just put a different angle on it, so they might say they were not successful and to assess that.
Well the only one that has come up is:
'The Angevin Kings were successful in achieving their aims in relation to the English Church in the years 1154 to 1216.' Assess the validity of this view.
Usually they seem to take the same idea and format of the questions and just put a different angle on it, so they might say they were not successful and to assess that.
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#13
(Original post by OwlMagic153)
Yeah I went with that, but they all had different aims and the structure I'm used to doing just doesn't fit. I think if it comes up I'm just gonna do another question. (Unless the Jews or Eleanor is either of them because our teacher decided we didn't need to know about them)
Posted from TSR Mobile
Yeah I went with that, but they all had different aims and the structure I'm used to doing just doesn't fit. I think if it comes up I'm just gonna do another question. (Unless the Jews or Eleanor is either of them because our teacher decided we didn't need to know about them)
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#15
after all John was on the last three
0
reply
(Original post by Charliefen)
I thought it was really good, exactly as I predicted! I did the Henry II and Becket question over whether criminous clerks caused the dispute and whether the government was disrupted during Richard's reign due to his absences. Knew Richard I was due to come up
after all John was on the last three
I thought it was really good, exactly as I predicted! I did the Henry II and Becket question over whether criminous clerks caused the dispute and whether the government was disrupted during Richard's reign due to his absences. Knew Richard I was due to come up
after all John was on the last three
What points did you put for causing dispute? Did you mention like becket excommunicating, Henry's actions such as trying him in court and also crowning of young Henry
0
reply
Report
#18
(Original post by MMMMM22)
What did you guys write for Richard essay?
What did you guys write for Richard essay?
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#19
I did becket & baronial rebellion question - am worried I didn't write enough for rebellion question. I did: It was oppressive kings - needed to limit power of Angevin despotism because there was no benchmark for their authority and added the clauses I.e 61 and then did the church and unlaw land seizing and added that finance could apply to Richard. Then just countered it with John's financial exploitation, the fact he was constantly present & his harsh treatment of individual barons. Worried I should have done his selective distribution of reward and office relating to clause 50. And that I didn't go into enough detail on Henry's legal reforms
0
reply
I am in the same boat as you... I thought what I did was right but not sure I answered right question.I said that there was little political dispute because of henry excellent appointments of government ensuring it was well run, excellent diplomacy ensuring england would not get invaded and finally like changes to legal reforms. and that there was political dispute due to bankrupting of angevin lands and poor decisions by Richard such as bad appointments and fail to produce heir which caused political and financial instability for government and in future.Idk what do you guys think of that?Posted from TSR Mobile[/QUOTE]
0
reply
X
Quick Reply
