UKIP's manifesto doesn't tell me anything

This is just copied and pasted from the first thing I noticed from 1 section:
· Spend an extra 40% on defence annually,
another 1% of GDP
· Expand the Army by 25% to 125,000 personnel and double the size of the Territorial Army
· Restore the Royal Navy to its 2001 strength
with three new aircraft carriers and nearly 70
other ships, at the same time guaranteeing the
future of the Plymouth, Portsmouth and Rosyth
bases

What don't you understand, its quite clear. This is in addition to their EU and immigration stuff, grammar schools, more prisons etc. In any case they are updating it I think since that was 2010 and the media is likely going to offer more strenuous scrutiny

They want to pull out of the European Union without thinking of the consequences of this action. Their attendance in the EP (European Parliament) is shockingly bad.

Their Leader just spouts populist rhetoric all the time

Surely, in a democracy, populist rhetoric is good as it represents the people. If he talks about leaving the EU and the public like it, then so be it - that's democracy.

Manifesto's aren't worth the paper they're written on.

I think the biggest incentive for voting UKIP is that it something different from the Conservative/Labour in-and-out party politics we have been burdened with.

They want to pull out of the European Union without thinking of the consequences of this action. Their attendance in the EP (European Parliament) is shockingly bad.

Their Leader just spouts populist rhetoric all the time

I cannot understand what UKIP stand for. They have no comprehensible policies whatsoever.

Please tell me 3 things that I can vote UKIP for

Surely, in a democracy, populist rhetoric is good as it represents the people. If he talks about leaving the EU and the public like it, then so be it - that's democracy.

Withdrawal from the EU.
Points based immigration, with only people who will be a net benefit to the country granted citizenship, with others granted work permits.
Far tougher prisons and prison sentences.

I advocate withdrawal from the EU because I am pro-death penalty. Bullets cost 50p; keeping prisoners in jail for life, costs the tax payer billions. So the 1st and 3rd point you bring up is beneficial to me.

The second point about immigration should already be a policy from the Tories. It should not be someone like Nigel Farage to suggest its implementation.

What do you think happens? The judge gives the verdict then they're taken into a room down the corridor and shot?

Not exactly. Here's some food for thought: Criminals who are executed in the USA have more, yes, more spent on them (through a combination of costs from being on death row and the execution itself) than criminals who are imprisoned for life.

Not in my government, they wouldn't.

It is clearly a way of saving cash, if implemented correctly.

What do you think happens? The judge gives the verdict then they're taken into a room down the corridor and shot?

Not exactly. Here's some food for thought: Criminals who are executed in the USA have more, yes, more spent on them (through a combination of costs from being on death row and the execution itself) than criminals who are imprisoned for life.

Plus, any civilised country doesn't practice execution by firing squad anymore. How barbaric.

Surely, in a democracy, populist rhetoric is good as it represents the people. If he talks about leaving the EU and the public like it, then so be it - that's democracy.

I advocate withdrawal from the EU because I am pro-death penalty. Bullets cost 50p; keeping prisoners in jail for life, costs the tax payer billions. So the 1st and 3rd point you bring up is beneficial to me.

The second point about immigration should already be a policy from the Tories. It should not be someone like Nigel Farage to suggest its implementation.