Im happy with the starting wage, I'll graduate on around £22k which is more than the average graduate will recieve, plus as i'll hold a degree this will allow me to progress quicker. Although what I do disagree with is the pay of specialist nurses, band 6's, many nurses are not being paid for the skills they do, one may hold the ability to do venepuncture, male catheterisation, prescribing etc and be on the same point as another managerial band 6, i think there should be a fianancial incentive for these skills. Plus it's not necessarily true that its cheaper to train nurses to be nurse consultants/practitioners. It's the similar role to the f1, which is 5/6 years in med school..the nurse consultant would have had 3year degree also, plus a 1/2 year masters (which are often funded by the NHS) plus the part time phd or Dphil they'd need to hold, which is 2-3 years, again mostly funded by the trust, it takes around 7 years of training within nursing, to get to that level. It's rather insulting when a new doctor complains that the asisstant practitioner or nurse specialist on the ward is paid a point higher than he is, when they've been a qualified nurse for 10 years, and gone through a masters and still studying for their Phd at the same time, specialists nurses do need to be paid more, and the band 6, 7, 8 roles are very scarce and underpaid in terms of what they do. However, the band 5 nurse- it can take a long time to progress without a degree and i think there should be more training opportunities or educational opportunities made available to those who're sort of 'trailing along' so to speak. A band 5 nurse on my last placement qualified in the late 70's, and just got her degree and is now doing her masters to become an orthopaedic nurse consultant, trained via the trust- which is great, but more opportunites are needed.