The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Original post by applicant2014
Do you mean that she can sue under Harrassment?

Isn't 'course of conduct' a continuing saga of problem on two or more occasions?

'Course of conduct' means that there must be at least two seperate instances where harassment was caused and the offender knew (or ought to have known) that their behaviour was causing harassment.

And the Harrassment Act 1979 was specifically drawn up to tackle stalking problem.

I'm afraid she can't really sue under Harrassment.

Edit : Harrassment Act 1997

This is clearly a misinterpretation of the law and the cases.
His actions were totally out of proportion to what you did. Like has been said many times, contact the police!

Looking on the bright side, thank your lucky stars you're not with this guy any more, cos **** knows what else he's capable of! :lolwut:
Original post by Old_Simon
This is clearly a misinterpretation of the law and the cases.



Did I misrepresent the law or did you misunderstand the law?

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (c 40) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which, among other things, criminalises and creates a right to protection from stalking and persistent bullying in the workplace.

Source: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_from_Harassment_Act_1997

The important part, as you highlighted, is "course of conduct". This means that there must be at least two seperate instances where harassment was caused and the offender knew (or ought to have known) that their behaviour was causing harassment.

Source : http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081226170519AAYVRvr
(edited 10 years ago)
Original post by applicant2014
Did I misrepresent the law or did you misunderstand the law?

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (c 40) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which, among other things, criminalises and creates a right to protection from stalking and persistent bullying in the workplace.

Source: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_from_Harassment_Act_1997

The important part, as you highlighted, is "course of conduct". This means that there must be at least two seperate instances where harassment was caused and the offender knew (or ought to have known) that their behaviour was causing harassment.

Source : http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081226170519AAYVRvr


What is purported to be the purpose of the act does not in fact appear in the legislation. You need to read the case law.
Reply 84
You don't deserve that. You kissed another guy and he sends everyone nude photos of you with horrific tag lines. You shouldn't take it lightly a photo saying "rape me" is extreme ! Steer clear of him and ask him to take down the photos if that doesn't work REPORT him !
Reply 85
Original post by Polkadot2
It is so annoying, TSR can't give people negative rep anymore ! This isn't Funny !!


1) She sent him nudes, which was stupid to begin with
2) She cheated
3) Her whole family knows what she is now :smile:
Reply 86
I actually feel sick thinking about this for you. That's so disproportionate.
Not getting the whole "You broke his trust so he broke yours. Get over it" line.

So every breach of trust is on the same level?

Ok, you promised me you'd arrive to our date on time tonight as you're always late. You broke that promise and therefore my trust. I'm going to sleep with your brother as a means of breaking yours in return.

Any fool can see that's nonsense.
Reply 88
Original post by Viva Emptiness
Not getting the whole "You broke his trust so he broke yours. Get over it" line.

So every breach of trust is on the same level?

Ok, you promised me you'd arrive to our date on time tonight as you're always late. You broke that promise and therefore my trust. I'm going to sleep with your brother as a means of breaking yours in return.

Any fool can see that's nonsense.


That breach of trust may have meant a lot to him
Original post by IAmABaws
That breach of trust may have meant a lot to him


Enough to print and distribute photos inciting rape and abuse? Enough to not only hurt her, but her family as well? Come on. If he'd given it a week or two to think about it he would never have done that - unless he has problems.
Reply 90
Original post by Viva Emptiness
Enough to print and distribute photos inciting rape and abuse? Enough to not only hurt her, but her family as well? Come on. If he'd given it a week or two to think about it he would never have done that - unless he has problems.


She shouldn't have taken the pics in the first place. That being said, she can go to the police regarding the rape/abuse messages. And her family got hurt by the truth? Can't really complain there.
Reply 91
Original post by IAmABaws
1) She sent him nudes, which was stupid to begin with
2) She cheated
3) Her whole family knows what she is now :smile:



What's wrong with your partner having nude photos? That kind of stuff should be kept PRIVATE though which you'd expect from a relationship.

Do you honestly believe that public humiliation and threatening insults "rape me " is a fair punishment for a kiss?
Original post by IAmABaws
She shouldn't have taken the pics in the first place. That being said, she can go to the police regarding the rape/abuse messages. And her family got hurt by the truth? Can't really complain there.


If I was a parent I'd be hurt by pictures of my kids naked being distributed, especially with taglines like that. Parents know their kids have sex, but actions like that can and will be painful - they are not being hurt by the "truth" (the fact that she kissed another guy), are they?

As for not having taken the pics in the first place is arguable, but it's pretty low to do something like that regardless. I'd never take my ex's greatest insecurities about them for example, and use it to crush their spirits, because I'm not a malicious person.

Basically it all boils down to: Do you think that distributing naked pictures of someone that say "Rape me" or whatever on them, is a perfectly reasonable response?
Original post by keromedic
But that doesn't mean that her actions warranted his. Just because you trust someone with a possession doesn't mean they should be able to distribute it or damage it.

In some cases, I'm inclined to side with the victim but his antion do appear to be extreme. I do question the character of someone who'd send nude shots of a person's grandchild to them.

Btw, I'm not saying this as he's a guy/ I've no such prejudice. If the roles were reversed, I'd say the same thing.


But that's the thing, if you trust them you take that risk. You are essentially trusting them to keep it private, but if you break their trust why should they keep yours? That's why I think it's different, this is him breaking her trust rather than going out to get something on her.
I agree that it wasn't necessary, but I can certainly see why he did it and I don't think it makes him an awful person.
Reply 94
Original post by Polkadot2
What's wrong with your partner having nude photos? That kind of stuff should be kept PRIVATE though which you'd expect from a relationship.

Do you honestly believe that public humiliation and threatening insults "rape me " is a fair punishment for a kiss?


To clarify, the insults are way too extreme. The pictures however, aren't.
Original post by Viva Emptiness
Not getting the whole "You broke his trust so he broke yours. Get over it" line.

So every breach of trust is on the same level?

Ok, you promised me you'd arrive to our date on time tonight as you're always late. You broke that promise and therefore my trust. I'm going to sleep with your brother as a means of breaking yours in return.

Any fool can see that's nonsense.


Cheating on someone is a pretty big breach of trust and is pretty hurtful to some people, you just have to look on TSR to see that. People can be messed up by cheating for ages and find it difficult to trust again. It's not a minor breach of trust.
His actions are extreme and yes, he should have been the better person, but his actions were certainly understandable.
Original post by Polkadot2
What's wrong with your partner having nude photos? That kind of stuff should be kept PRIVATE though which you'd expect from a relationship.

Do you honestly believe that public humiliation and threatening insults "rape me " is a fair punishment for a kiss?


Yes, from a relationship. You also expect loyalty in a relationship, which he didn't get. Hence the relationship is over. That's why you shouldn't just send photos to any partner because the relationship could end but photos are forever. If you don't want them online, don't send them in the first place.
I certainly would only consider taking photos for someone if I was engaged/married, and I'd have to think carefully even then.
Reply 97
Original post by Viva Emptiness
It might not be, I said potentially. It's nearly impossible to get images removed from the internet, and once they find their way on to porn/adult dating sites as advertisement/content you're practically buggered. You can ask to take it down, and they might, but it will almost certainly pop up in several other places. You don't think this revenge is completely out of proportion? Hurting her family as well?


She didn't say they were on the internet just sent? Yeah if they're on the internet they could be impossible to get rid of. No not at all, he probably felt like he wanted to hurt her back and this was the only way he could come up with and to be honest I'd rather my parents and grandparents see a picture of my penis that be cheated on.

Original post by clh_hilary
Call the police. Sue him.


Don't give people advice with regards to the law when you clearly know absolutely nothing about it


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 98
Original post by MrsSheldonCooper
Oh wow I know he should be upset but that's gone too far. OP he's breaking the law by sending pics of you around without your permission. Get the police involved


Please explain which law he is breaking. Aside from copyright infringement potentially, he hasn't committed any crime


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Old_Simon
What is purported to be the purpose of the act does not in fact appear in the legislation. You need to read the case law.


Yes, it wasn't really stated in the Act explicitly but it was widely known that the Parliament passed this act because of increasing reported stalking cases.

'This Act {The Protection from Harrassment Act 1997} was passed following public concern over the problem of 'stalkers', after a number of much-publicised cases in which individuals became obsessed with an ex-girlfriend or -boyfriend, a celebrity or even a mere acquaintance, and subjected them to constant and often long-term harrassment.'

This is an excerpt from the published book named 'Eighth Edition : Tort Law' by Catherine Elliott and Frances Quinn.

I did not simply make this up.

Anyway, still, my advice to OP would be report it to the police. I believe they know how to handle it.
(edited 10 years ago)

Latest

Trending

Trending