believing in god is more about faith and logic than using scientific evidence. Come on... if everything on this planet originates from somewhere why is it that you think humans and earth randomly popped out of nowhere. Why do you think that we are able breath, drink and eat to live. Our body is one the most complex mechanism on this planet, how the hell did that popped out of thin air. There is no proof god exists, but it's more believable to have faith that god does.

Reply 46

VannR

21

That he is vindictive, power-mad bastard for both demanding that we praise it and follow its commands to avoid going to Hell, and yet gives us free will to do otherwise and makes its presence very obscure to the beings which God himself created to believe whatever has the most supporting evidence i.e. that there is no God.

It is almost as if the purpose of such a God would be to punish people for not following orders.

Reply 47

FigurativeTart

14

Original post by Hollowdon

believing in god is more about faith and logic than using scientific evidence. Come on... if everything on this planet originates from somewhere why is it that you think humans and earth randomly popped out of nowhere. Why do you think that we are able breath, drink and eat to live. Our body is one the most complex mechanism on this planet, how the hell did that popped out of thin air. There is no proof god exists, but it's more believable to have faith that god does.

You know what triggered that?

Spoiler

Reply 48

FigurativeTart

14

Original post by Sam Walters

There is no heaven and there is no hell.

Prove otherwise or keep quiet.

I am sorry, but I couldn't resist.

Reply 49

SH0405

15

Original post by drowzee

God does not exist

Correct.

Reply 50

Hollowdon

4

Original post by LaMandarine

You know what triggered that?

Spoiler

That's just a theory, proof or go to hell?

Reply 51

ComputerMaths97

17

Why would our lives change if God was real?

Me is confused.

Reply 52

Absent Agent

21

Original post by ComputerMaths97

Why would our lives change if God was real?

Me is confused.

that's a real answer, though religious people would have to think about that before saying that

Reply 53

EmmaLouise2503

if God was real surely he would prove it other than a book ?

Reply 54

FigurativeTart

14

Original post by Hollowdon

That's just a theory, proof or go to hell?

I would happily submerge in a cauldron of pitch than to give you a GCSE lesson on the theory of Evolution if you believe in Creationism.

My greatest sin is that I can't be arsed to show people like you how wonderful organisms are, and how beautifully they have evolved in time.

Reply 55

Sam Walters

3

Original post by Hollowdon

believing in god is more about faith and logic than using scientific evidence. Come on... if everything on this planet originates from somewhere why is it that you think humans and earth randomly popped out of nowhere. Why do you think that we are able breath, drink and eat to live. Our body is one the most complex mechanism on this planet, how the hell did that popped out of thin air. There is no proof god exists, but it's more believable to have faith that god does.

What logic is there? To believe in something I've never seen nor there is evidence for or to believe in something that there is evidence for and oh wait working in science things I have observed for myself.

Simple as that really. We didn't randomly pop out of somewhere. Its taken roughly 14 billion years to get to this stage. We have evidence to an extent for this. But if you say god created everything. Where he god come from in the first place?

Religion was the creation of man to control. Nothing more. Science changes its views based upon what is observed. Religion does not.

Reply 56

LenaSim

5

Oh well. Idgaf anyway.

Reply 57

XxSophie01xX

12

I am a strict atheist but if God WAS real, I would like to discuss his purpose in creating humans to be the way they are. It would be an education rather than a moment of awe-struck wide-eyed wonder.

Reply 58

Sam Walters

3

Original post by LaMandarine

I am sorry, but I couldn't resist.

Items pre-dating any religious texts using techniques on known age items to provide estimate and comparison. Therefore making claims of religion invalid. Including this one. Next?