Bodily hair

What matters is what you want to do with your body.

Yes, I absolutely agree but your partner is entitled to a preference and allowed to express that preference.

As a male I prefer nothing down there. Much nicer if going down. Looks better.

I personally find hairy armpits or legs an absolute turn off. Could happily have a gf with a full bush, but not hairy armpits - proper ick territory.

Some do, some don't.

What matters is what you want to do with your body.

Yes, I absolutely agree but your partner is entitled to a preference and allowed to express that preference.

As a male I prefer nothing down there. Much nicer if going down. Looks better.

I personally find hairy armpits or legs an absolute turn off. Could happily have a gf with a full bush, but not hairy armpits - proper ick territory.

The marketing is that it's more hygienic to remove pubic hair.
The reality is that it's more hygienic as per the technical definition of hygienic to leave your hair on.

It's clever marketing from Procter & Gamble and other multinational corporations to make so many people think that using their hair removal products leads to greater hygiene.

This marketing is so pervasive that the majority of men prefer shaven havens.
However, there's still enough men out there that aren't bothered or have a slight preference for natural that it's not a major issue.

Plus there's scope for any individual woman to unbrainwash individual men.

So go ahead and flick two fingers up to the Overton Window of "must remove hair" and demonstrate to a special man in your life how sexy and attractive (in multiple ways) you are.

Yes, I absolutely agree but your partner is entitled to a preference and allowed to express that preference.

As a male I prefer nothing down there. Much nicer if going down. Looks better.

I personally find hairy armpits or legs an absolute turn off. Could happily have a gf with a full bush, but not hairy armpits - proper ick territory.

The marketing is that it's more hygienic to remove pubic hair.
The reality is that it's more hygienic as per the technical definition of hygienic to leave your hair on.

It's clever marketing from Procter & Gamble and other multinational corporations to make so many people think that using their hair removal products leads to greater hygiene.

This marketing is so pervasive that the majority of men prefer shaven havens.
However, there's still enough men out there that aren't bothered or have a slight preference for natural that it's not a major issue.

Plus there's scope for any individual woman to unbrainwash individual men.

So go ahead and flick two fingers up to the Overton Window of "must remove hair" and demonstrate to a special man in your life how sexy and attractive (in multiple ways) you are.

Works both ways. Are you completely hairless everywhere down there too?

Expressing a preference on someone's body hair is no different to expressing a preference someone is thinner, wears their hair differently, wears certain clothes etc. You don't express a preference unless directly asked, if you want someone you take them as they are or look elsewhere.

This is such nonsense and typical of millennial narcissism, thinking that everything is in the here and now.

Women (and men) have been removing body hair since antiquity. Certainly in Egyptian times and certainly in Classical Greece. But noooo....obviously it's Proctor & Gamble.

I appreciate this but I fee like it’s easier said.
I just want to know if it’s off putting seeing hair hair on a women, and as I mentioned places like the back and stomach especially where the hairs are very short and thin so pointless to remove but still quite visible.


I think I’m just insecure about it looking unfeminine (which I don’t think is a word but I think you understand what I mean)

Look at pornographic magazines and films from the 1960's & 1970's. Wall to wall hairy bush.



It will be part of the P&G marketing that hair removal has been around since ancient Egyptian times.

I don’t mind it, but sometimes it makes me insecure.



I agree to these places only because it’s more hygienic too in my opinion but what about baby hairs on someone’s back or stomach?

You may get the odd man with an anti-hair fetish for those areas. **** em! Not literally. Metaphorically.

Try to release worrying about stuff like this. Aim to get on with living the most incredibly rewarding / enjoyable / adventure filled life that you can.
Owning who and what you are will significantly increase how attractive you are to men. Being confident / assertive in being the real genuine you will make you more attractive to men.

Some do, some don't.
Different guys often have very different attraction dealbreakers, beauty standards and relationship preferences.
A happy sexually active relationship is based on compatible dealbreakers, mutual attraction, effective communication, shared ambitions and lifestyle preferences.

It depends where it is. A moustache, for instance, is quite off-putting.

if it’s unhygienic on a woman why isn’t it unhygienic on a man??

I personally don't care as long as her armpits are shaved.

I agree to these places only because it’s more hygienic too in my opinion but what about baby hairs on someone’s back or stomach?

Works both ways. Are you completely hairless everywhere down there too?

Don't mind one bit.

Even if the hair is darker and visible?