Why is it wrong to judge people you don't know?

Because, by definition, you'd be judging them on their gender, race, religion, appearance etc. or a combination of the above as you can't judge them on their personality if you don't know them

Does anyone actually define this as an "absolute wrong"? We all probably do it to a greater or lesser extent.

The problem with judging people we don't know is that that judgement is usually based on a set of assumptions which probably don't survive close scrutiny. Why? Because people are more complicated than they often seem. So it's not that judging strangers is wrong so much as it is completely ineffective.

My other thought is that getting all riled up about what other people get up to tends to be preserve of the chronically embittered and repressed. If I'm happy, why should I care what you're doing?

Because, by definition, you'd be judging them on their gender, race, religion, appearance etc. or a combination of the above as you can't judge them on their personality if you don't know them

And? I don't get why this is "bad". if it's a stranger, I just move on.

Your spiritualist/subjective values aside, it's a free world, why does it matter how people think? Thought cannot be controlled anyhow.

Federer is better sorry, saw your username and had to say it

Nooo, Djokovic is amazing!

Some people just give off bad vibes , i can tell within seconds if I like someone and it we're gonna get on, my judge of character is spot on . Although this isn't necessarily the right way to do things

Would you want someone making an assumption about you based on your ethnicity, size, gender..? Obviously it's impossible to prevent this completely but don't you see that it's best to try not to

You sound very familiar...

Yes, I can read you too and say you expect me to "like" you when I don't know who you are..

Why would I expect that?

Because it's the norm of society... And I know how you respond to things, I know how you tick.