Is it illegal to get with a girl in the year below in school?

technically it's illegal but with a mere 2 year age gap the police won't peruse you should someone notify them

if you were like 21 on the otherhand there's a decent chance they'd want to prosecute

Hi, I'm 16 turning 17 this weekend and I've been talking to a girl in the year below me that's 15 and turning 16 in July. We've been talking to eachother for a long time now and so far we've just been kissing, but now she's saying she wants to try give me a blowjob this weekend for my birthday.

But I'm worried about her being in the year below me, is it illegal to continue kissing or have her give me a blowjob on my 17th birthday whilst she's still 15? I don't want to do anything that's illegal but I don't want to lose her at the same time and have her go do it with someone else if i say no.

Haha, I've seen stupider be prosecuted so don't be so sure!

In America they'd most likely come after him ....but in Britain they're not gonna be bothered by it....

Oh no, it certainly happens here too.

link to news article?

I've seen people be charged locally, but I'm not prepared to trawl through a couple years of Gazette archives just to find you a source. Take it or leave it, I could not care less :^)

no link from you because police in this country don't pursue cases with such minor age gaps.


simples.

All it takes is the father of a 15 year old to find out his precious little princess took a 🍆 and to report the kid that did it for stat-rape; the UK does not have a close-in-age exemption when it comes to prosecution.

You're just ignorant - simples 😂😂

I'm the ignorant one?


you don't even know what you're talking about dude. lol. Talking straight out of your rear end in this thread.


you cannot be charged for stat rape of a 15 year old, it's under 13.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_rape

"The Explanatory Notes read: "Whether or not the child consented to this act is irrelevant".^[32] The term 'rape' therefore is used only with regard to children under 13; consensual sexual penetration of a child above 13 but under 16 is defined as 'Sexual activity with a child', and punished less severely (section 9, which requires the perpetrator to be 18 or over). A minor can also be guilty for sexual contact with another minor (section 13), but the Explanatory Notes state that decisions whether to prosecute in cases where both parties are minors are to be taken on a case by case basis.^[33] The Crown Prosecution guidelines state "t is not in the public interest to prosecute children who are of the same or similar age and understanding that engage in sexual activity, where the activity is truly consensual for both parties and there are no aggravating features, such as coercion or corruption."


Also note the bolded part. The police don't care if the age gap is like 2 years.

Statutory rape is a common term referred to as sex with a minor (apologies), however, if you're looking to get technical, the official offence would be Sexual activity with a child contrary to Section 13 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which states that "A person under 18 commits an offence if he does anything which would be an offence under any of sections 9 to 12 if he were aged 18".

Section 9 of the SOA (2003) refers to the offence I stated, "Sexual activity with a child". Granted, the punishment is lower, but it IS STILL A CRIMINAL OFFENCE.


Wikipedia is simply not a reliable source of information, especially considering the legislation is freely available. Feel free to educate yourself: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42


In regards to your statement "police don't care", that is absolutely false. It is treated on a case-by-case basis, and as was proven by a local prosecution, the "victims" father pushed for prosecution of the 17yr old.

(EDIT: If it will really cheer you up I'll try digging out the article, but that's difficult to do when I cannae remember the exact date it was published! It's also worth noting that the Police and the CPS are not the same public body, yet you seem to believe that they are!)

I never said it wasn't a criminal offence. In fact if you re read my first post in this thread you will see me say that is illegal.

and yes, the police effectively don't care if they are close in age as they don't prosecute. There are no extenuating circumstances mentioned in the OP like violence or exploitation so no he's not going to get prosecuted

And who's to say the victim wouldn't get a bit p**sed off and report him? It's happened before, and it's sure to happen again. It's hardly a rare occurrence!

One should never put themselves in a position where someone can hold that over your head, as they can really mess your life up by reporting you. Sure, nothing might come of it, but that's not a certainty.