The Student Room Group

British Muslims: 'You are lazy if you say extremism is not Islamic'

Scroll to see replies

Reply 60
Original post by tomfailinghelp
Um, it well may be that 'everyone's morals are different', but we can all agree that condemning the behavior of Jihadists is good if it reduces Jihadist activity.

Perhaps more contentious is whether we can agree that the Islamic community distancing itself from Jihadism/Islamic Extremism is morally good, but I don't see why it shouldn't be? Certainly there would be nothing bad about it, it would make a lot of people more happy and comfortable, and it would be a good thing because it would be a display of solidarity against extremism - which is in itself good.


Why don't we focus our time on trying to find another solution, tensions between communities are bad enough as it is
Original post by emski
Why don't we focus our time on trying to find another solution, tensions between communities are bad enough as it is


Because the only possible downside to this solution is if the Islamic community feels uncomfortable criticizing Islamic terrorism, and consequently either there's no reason to look for another solution first, unless the Islamic community is uncomfortable with rejecting terrorism.
It's true and it goes well beyond laziness and into almost a group sociopathy


I don't hate Muslims, but the moment they simply say "this has nothing to do with Islam" instantly, I think they care more about protecting their own image than they do about ensuring that this never happens again. It shows a desire to wash your hands of social responsibility, it doesn't just apply to this either, it applies to genital mutilation, honour killings, colourism and so forth.

I fully appreciate that not every Muslim is like this, whatever they say, they are a person first and Muslim second. Equally, the West has not been forceful enough in demanding civilised behaviour from Muslims; every time there has been an attack or Muslims hold opinions which are not socially acceptable, rather than being told it's disgusting and has no place in any society, not just in the west, but anywhere in the world, you have some mealy mouthed, ballness White person coming out with the "extremist minority, moderate majority" shtick.
(edited 9 years ago)
Reply 63
Original post by tomfailinghelp
Because the only possible downside to this solution is if the Islamic community feels uncomfortable criticizing Islamic terrorism, and consequently either there's no reason to look for another solution first, unless the Islamic community is uncomfortable with rejecting terrorism.


Exactly who should condemn it? Religious leaders or any religious believer?
Original post by emski
Exactly who should condemn it? Religious leaders or any religious believer?


It would be constructive if religious leaders condemned it, it would be constructive is religious believers condemned it, it would be even more constructive if both condemned it.

Note well that I did not say that they 'should' condemn it, nor have I ever said that. In fact, I think you're quite well aware that I've never suggested any element of obligation on the Muslim community in anything I've said, and I hope that anybdy reading that recognizes this too. All I have said, unapologetically, is that it would be a very good thing for members of the Islamic community, any and all members, to actively and vocally reject Islamic extremism.

Isn't this true? Are you denying this?
Reply 65
Original post by tomfailinghelp
It would be constructive if religious leaders condemned it, it would be constructive is religious believers condemned it, it would be even more constructive if both condemned it.

Note well that I did not say that they 'should' condemn it, nor have I ever said that. In fact, I think you're quite well aware that I've never suggested any element of obligation on the Muslim community in anything I've said, and I hope that anybdy reading that recognizes this too. All I have said, unapologetically, is that it would be a very good thing for members of the Islamic community, any and all members, to actively and vocally reject Islamic extremism.

Isn't this true? Are you denying this?


I think religious leaders then yes but not random muslims
Original post by emski
I think religious leaders then yes but not random muslims


What would be bad about random Muslims condemning Islamic terrorism?
Reply 67
Original post by tomfailinghelp
What would be bad about random Muslims condemning Islamic terrorism?


Because that could lead to people in the street going up to them and confronting them, some of my friends already feel uneasy with everyone staring at them and making comments
Original post by emski
Because that could lead to people in the street going up to them and confronting them, some of my friends already feel uneasy with everyone staring at them and making comments


What in the world makes you think that, if random Muslims vocally condemned Islamic terrorism, people would go up to them and confront them? If anything, surely it would make that less likely, because those who (of course unreasonably) act prejudicially toward individual Muslims would have the feeling that there was sympathy from the Islamic community towards terrorism, would have that belief undermined?

This is just not a good reason.
Reply 69
Original post by tomfailinghelp
What in the world makes you think that, if random Muslims vocally condemned Islamic terrorism, people would go up to them and confront them? If anything, surely it would make that less likely, because those who (of course unreasonably) act prejudicially toward individual Muslims would have the feeling that there was sympathy from the Islamic community towards terrorism, would have that belief undermined?

This is just not a good reason.


Past experience of saying something and then people coming up to me to talk about it.
Original post by emski
Past experience of saying something and then people coming up to me to talk about it.


Anecdotal experience isn't really a great guide to the likelihood that this would actually happen to many people.

Nonetheless, I do wonder what problem you really have with people asking you about it? That seems like a good thing really, doesn't it suggest that aggression towards Muslims is to be replaced by understanding, if your case reflects what would generally happen?
Reply 71
Original post by tomfailinghelp
Anecdotal experience isn't really a great guide to the likelihood that this would actually happen to many people.

Nonetheless, I do wonder what problem you really have with people asking you about it? That seems like a good thing really, doesn't it suggest that aggression towards Muslims is to be replaced by understanding, if your case reflects what would generally happen?


I think we should focus on educating everyone about other cultures rather than people jumping to conclusions based on the media
What has that got to do with being 'lazy'?
Original post by emski
I think we should focus on educating everyone about other cultures rather than people jumping to conclusions based on the media


Okay, you've just totally removed yourself from the conversation now.

The problem isn't, primarily, people 'jumping to conclusions based on the media' - the problem is that people assume any criticism of Islam or the actions of the Muslim community in general is based in racism.

If you really want to popularize racism, the way to go about doing it is to conflate people like me, who suggest that it would be good for the Islamic community actually to vocally condemn terrorism, with actual racists, because it will only give the latter group credibility.

Original post by clh_hilary
What has that got to do with being 'lazy'?


Because it's an easy escape from a substantial problem. That is, you can actually tackle the issues faced by the Western world and the Islamic community, or you can pretend the problem doesn't exist by saying 'terrorism isn't Islamic', or its cousin, 'it's all American foreign policy'.
Reply 74
Original post by tomfailinghelp
Okay, you've just totally removed yourself from the conversation now.

The problem isn't, primarily, people 'jumping to conclusions based on the media' - the problem is that people assume any criticism of Islam or the actions of the Muslim community in general is based in racism.

If you really want to popularize racism, the way to go about doing it is to conflate people like me, who suggest that it would be good for the Islamic community actually to vocally condemn terrorism, with actual racists, because it will only give the latter group credibility.



there is a problem with the media, all of this islamic terrorism news is making people jump to irrational conclusions and no I don't believe that criticising terrorism is racism, I feel that we should be taught about other cultures and religions and then people can see the difference between the religion and the extremists.
Original post by tomfailinghelp
snip


Why bother asking them to condemn it ?

The extremists interpretation of the Quran and Hadiths is perhaps a more plausible understanding, most Muslims either subscribe to that interpretation or have no solid scriptural rebut.

You see Muslims like Resa Aslan (or that girl you are talking to) play apologetic acrobatics as they go off into some tangent about the underlying message and contextual understanding of blah blah blah. And they waffle on about things with no substance........ the Quran simply calls for the death and subjugation of non-Muslims, and Muslims teach it to their children.

The Muslim community is hugely vocal and unified whenever something negative is said about their faith or it is criticised, you would think that people propagating a supposedly bastardised interpretation of it so as to have their children literally become apostates and kill themselves whilst raping/enslaving/committing genocide would have them going apeshlt...........strangely, there is silence.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Reptilian
Who do you think is out there on the ground fighting these extremists and having the heaviest losses? Muslims.

The truth is however that the Western nations (America's little whores including the UK) are allowing these rebel groups to come into existence by toppling stable governments and supporting these crazy rebel groups.


Posted from TSR Mobile


Pretty much this. You want random civilians to apologise for or "condemn" what someone else does, especially when they are mostly killing Muslims. They only want us to speak out about extremism when the victims are non-muslim yet don't give a damn about us apologising when Muslims are the victims.
Original post by emski
there is a problem with the media, all of this islamic terrorism news is making people jump to irrational conclusions and no I don't believe that criticising terrorism is racism, I feel that we should be taught about other cultures and religions and then people can see the difference between the religion and the extremists.


But that's to assume that there isn't a connection between Islam and Islamist Terrorism, when obviously there is.


Original post by JohnCrichton89
Why bother asking them to condemn it ?

The extremists interpretation of the Quran and Hadiths is perhaps a more plausible understanding, most Muslims either subscribe to that interpretation or have no solid scriptural rebut.

You see Muslims like Resa Aslan (or that girl you are talking to) play apologetic acrobatics as they go off into some tangent about the underlying message and contextual understanding of blah blah blah. And they waffle on about things with no substance........ the Quran simply calls for the death and subjugation of non-Muslims, and Muslims teach it to their children.

The Muslim community is hugely vocal and unified whenever something negative is said about their faith or it is criticised, you would think that people propagating a supposedly bastardised interpretation of it so as to have their children literally become apostates and kill themselves whilst raping/enslaving/committing genocide would have them going apeshlt...........strangely, there is silence.


Indeed.
Reply 78
Original post by emski
You don't even think thats sad?


I'm not sure what something being sad has to do with it being understandable. People dislike the citizens of a country for what other countries' governments do, which is sad, but understandable.
Original post by SophiaLDN
Pretty much this. You want random civilians to apologise for or "condemn" what someone else does, especially when they are mostly killing Muslims. They only want us to speak out about extremism when the victims are non-muslim yet don't give a damn about us apologising when Muslims are the victims.


Um, who said anything about who the victims are?

I would say that it was good for Muslims to vocally condemn Islamic Terrorists whoever they were killing, it isn't about that, it's about an obvious connection between the religion and the terrorism that might well be partially severed if the community takes active steps to sever it.

What is so strange about wanting Muslims to condemn terrorism? To me, it seems rather just like it is good for Socialists to explicitly reject Totalitarianism.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending