Could someone explain this differently? The title of the graph is the association of obesity and potential risk factors if at all relevant (it cut off).
Hey there, thanks for posting a question in the Medicine forum.
The Medicine forum gets a high volume of questions being posted, and some of these are already answered by the resources and Megathreads that members of the community and volunteers have created. This is an automatic post which is designed to highlight these resources. Below is a list of threads and articles that could answer your question (you should be looking in the original post of the megathreads). If one of the below threads is a more relevant place to ask your question, please post a reply in that thread to ask your question. If your query is answered by one of the Megathreads or articles linked below, and you would like us to close this thread for you, please reply to this thread with just the words "thank you". A member of our team will then get it locked.
If your query is answered by one of the Megathreads or articles linked above, and you would like us to close this thread for you, please reply to this thread with just the words "thank you". A member of our team will then get it locked.
Could someone explain this differently? The title of the graph is the association of obesity and potential risk factors if at all relevant (it cut off).
So basically the graph isn showing the amount of males and females in each group but the proportion/ratio. for example in the whole population there could be much more females than males and although there is a lower ratio of females to males in the graph there could still be more females.
So basically the graph isn showing the amount of males and females in each group but the proportion/ratio. for example in the whole population there could be much more females than males and although there is a lower ratio of females to males in the graph there could still be more females.
oh okay, so we don't know for sure if there's more males or females? i'm confused because it says the quintile is 1/5 of the test population so doesn't that mean that we have the same number of males/females? and if the ratio for males is higher then doesn't that mean there's more males and less females?
oh okay, so we don't know for sure if there's more males or females? i'm confused because it says the quintile is 1/5 of the test population so doesn't that mean that we have the same number of males/females? and if the ratio for males is higher then doesn't that mean there's more males and less females?
we arent told anything about the tea population, for all we know in the test population there could be 1000000 females ad 5 men. so what im getting at it doesnt explicitly say how many males and females there are. dont overthink.. trust me
we arent told anything about the tea population, for all we know in the test population there could be 1000000 females ad 5 men. so what im getting at it doesnt explicitly say how many males and females there are. dont overthink.. trust me
okay thanks so essentially we can't conclude and it could be either way, there could be more females or there could be less