Wow, there are many troubling points about this response. I shall narrow it down to just four:
1. That you believe there is indeed a "nature of women". As if 4 billion people, with unique experiences and genetic expressions, can be generalised across so off-handedly.
2. This is even more problematic if you accept that gender is self-defining (which I believe). Since biology is not what defines a woman, the people who fall under the category of "women" are therefore linked only in as arbitrary a connection as all persons called "John" are connected. No one in their right mind would profess to have unlock the nature of Johns.
3. That you believe you know so much about a gender you have not experienced is also a perplexing one. It would be as if I were to speak for all the self-defining men, or all black people - a ridiculous notion if you consider that I am not one, nor would my single experience of being one speak for everyone else.
4. Putting the word "logic" in quotation marks after female is both offensive and unjust. This is especially the case that you have you not supported any of your statements with reason nor evidence. It is merely more of the tired, over-used rhetoric that women are incapable of rational thought or logical reasoning. Give us both the same logic test and I am fairly sure I would have the upper-hand.
I hope you can see the clear logic in what I have just said.