Oxford vs Cambridge

Which is better/lenient for medicine

Which is better/lenient for medicine

Both are far ahead of anywhere else though.

That’s a pretty sweeping statement. Depends on what you mean by ‘far ahead’….

What measure of 'better' do you want? Oxford grads do a bit better in doctor's exams I guess? Both are far ahead of anywhere else though. They also pass the first year as a doctor marginally more, and do somewhat better in the exam you do to get your first job. But there are lots of other measures of 'better' or 'good doctor' people will argue for.

What a lot of nonsense! Please don't pass off speculation as fact like this - it has the potential to mislead applicants. Outlandish claims like this need referencing via a reliable, credible source if you want them to be taken seriously (good luck with that, lol)

Ok ok - but just to check, I come back with references showing Oxbridge do better in exams, pass first year as a doctor more often, and do better (not the best every year, but better) on the exam to get your first job, it sounds like it'd shake up your world view of med schools a lot yes?

Ok ok - but just to check, I come back with references showing Oxbridge do better in exams, pass first year as a doctor more often, and do better (not the best every year, but better) on the exam to get your first job, it sounds like it'd shake up your world view of med schools a lot yes?

Passing MRCS/MRCP part 1 is not the be all and end all of measures of what makes a "good" doctor though. Likewise ARCP outcomes that are unsatisfactory can be down to a variety of reasons and there are many factors (GEM grads tend to be more likely to get a poorer ARCP outcome, but this doesn't mean they can't and don't make good doctors). Also MRCP/MRCS part 1 performance doesn't even mean anything for people planning to go into specialties not requiring those .Also some of those postgraduate exams have very low pass rates across the board, and it's not uncommon for doctors to need more than one attempt.

Additionally correlation does not imply causation. It's not possible to conclusively say that there is a causal relationship between where one did their medical degree affects how "good a doctor" they become, and it would be misleading to do so. For example the nature of the kinds of students who tend to self select into applying to Oxbridge may be the cause of the correlation, rather than the degree itself, for example. I'd also note that the difference between the "best" and "worst" performing medical schools in those metrics are relatively small, and most of the "worst" performing medical schools are the newest

The world is considerably less simplistic than you paint it, and it's unhelpful to skew applicant's views on the basis of very reductive reasoning like this.

Which is better/lenient for medicine

Credible references attesting to those 'facts' - I'll eat my hat.

Edit: 'credible' means published, authoritative, peer-reviewed or established sources. They do not include social media, blogs, opinions, speculation, hearsay or other tittle-tattle.

Oxford and Cambridge have the some of the best reputations in the world. QS rankings have them as the top 2 medical schools in the UK. And for the majority of courses, going to oxbridge will give you a significant advantage in terms of employability. However, medicine is one of the few EXCEPTIONS. Oxford and Cambridge certainly are fantastic medical schools (I'd argue they all are though lmao), but they give you no advantage in terms of getting a job as a doctor. As far as I'm aware, the university you go to isn't even looked at. Oxbridge probably go into more detail in terms of scientific content, but all medical schools in the UK cover what is required to become a junior doctor. Their traditional course structure means you get very little patient contact in the first 3 years.

I'm actually applying to Oxford med myself this year, but I still don't think it's better than the others. As far as I'm aware, there are certain unis with lower admissions to offer ratios, so you could argue that oxbridge isn't even the most competitive. Oxford has lower grade requirements. Cambridge also pretty much needs 3 science subjects. Oxford interviews WAY less applicants than Cambridge.

If you want to apply to oxbridge, that's great. But don't do it cos of its reputation.

Yup - exam results are not the be all and end all of what makes a good doctor.

Also - ranking tables are not a straightforward way to assess anything - there are many different ranking tables, produced by many different organisations. Each of these use different criteria and hence produce different results, there’s no definitive ranking list, it’s all too subjective.

I had the grades for Cambridge, my BMAT would have got me an interview. I chose not to apply because I didn’t feel the course structure would be right for me - particularly the late patient contact. Does that mean that I’m automatically going to be an inferior doctor? I’ve been consistently in the top decile for the first three years of the course I am doing…

Yup - exam results are not the be all and end all of what makes a good doctor.

Also - ranking tables are not a straightforward way to assess anything - there are many different ranking tables, produced by many different organisations. Each of these use different criteria and hence produce different results, there’s no definitive ranking list, it’s all too subjective.

I had the grades for Cambridge, my BMAT would have got me an interview. I chose not to apply because I didn’t feel the course structure would be right for me - particularly the late patient contact. Does that mean that I’m automatically going to be an inferior doctor? I’ve been consistently in the top decile for the first three years of the course I am doing…

Ok claims were:

"Oxford grads do a bit better in doctor's exams I guess? Both are far ahead of anywhere else though".

Best source for this has unfortunately been removed. Another user had a screenshot of it here: https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=7102578&page=244#post97612098, with Oxbridge unfortunate cut off the top but you can just see the dot of where Cambridge is, Oxford is above that.
Its the source referred to in this article again: https://www.medsci.ox.ac.uk/news/gmc-report-highlights-oxford-medical-school2019s-graduate-success
But that's very unsatisfactory so here are some peer reviewed articles, as requested: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1741-7015-6-5
https://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g2621
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22331918/

"They ... pass the first year as a doctor marginally more [often]".

Again main source is now removed, but mentioned in the same article, source being a report from the GMC https://www.medsci.ox.ac.uk/news/gmc-report-highlights-oxford-medical-school2019s-graduate-success

"[Oxford students] do somewhat better in the exam you do to get your first job":

Called the SJT. See table 1.18. There is a report like this every year. https://healtheducationengland.sharepoint.com/sites/UKFPOT/WebDocs/Forms/AllItems.aspx?id=%2Fsites%2FUKFPOT%2FWebDocs%2F6%2E%20Resources%2FReports%2FRecruitment%20Stats%20and%20Facts%2F2019%20Recruitment%20Stats%20and%20Facts%20Report%2Epdf&parent=%2Fsites%2FUKFPOT%2FWebDocs%2F6%2E%20Resources%2FReports%2FRecruitment%20Stats%20and%20Facts&p=true&ga=1


When I first heard this, and how huge the difference was, I found it really shocking so can definitely empathise with you not believing it at first!